On Nursing a Toddler: Why that TIME Magazine Mom Could Have Been Me
Shocking or no big deal? A woman breastfeeding her 3-year-old son is the cover photo of this week's Time magazine for a story on "attachment parenting," and reactions ranged from applause to cringing to shrugs.
TORONTO — The jury's out on whether or not it's breastfeeding at its best or parenting at its worst. Either way, it's a picture that has tongues wagging.
A controversial Time magazine cowl photo goes viral and folks across the world, Canadians included, are voicing their opinions.
The image options Jamie Lynne Grumet, a slim, blonde 26-year-old la mother of 2, breastfeeding her younger son Aram, who turns four next month.
Aram stands on a chair to succeed in his mother's chest and casts a sidelong look at the camera as he feeds.
The accompanying headline for a story on attachment parenting asks readers in bright red letters if they're "mom enough."
Many took to the web to criticize the photograph, saying its widespread publication would hurt Aram when he grows older.
"Kid's too recent," Tammy King wrote on Canadian Family magazine's Facebook page. "That is simply too extreme," added Lisa Matthews.
Toronto-based blogger Dee Brun wasted no time ripping into Grumet for subjecting her son to unavoidable teasing within the future.
"The real story here lies with that three year recent boy who can need to re-live this image OVER and OVER for the remainder of his life," the mother of 4 blogged. "SHAME ON MOM... for making one thing her son can NEVER be able to escape from."
Others, however, expressed support for Grumet, saying she was brave to indicate there's nothing wrong with a natural method.
"Get over it individuals," Nicole Demers Sivyer wrote, adding that the typical age of weaning round the world ranges from 3 years to 6.
"I'm appalled and saddened by the blatant disregard for kid-lead weaning and therefore the standards that some individuals feel they have to impose on how others offer nourishment for his or her child."
Melissa Dickinson, meanwhile, chided some for viewing the image in an exploitative lightweight.
"If this seems like kid porn to you then you're a pervert and therefore the problems lie among you," she posted.
Still additional merely expressed their surprise at the provocative image and accused Time of using it simply to sell copies when the magazine hits stands.
"Her selections do not have an effect on any of ours," wrote Alexise Dodd Clarke. "It's obvious they're obtaining the eye from the quilt they wished."
Calgary resident Buzz Bishop, who blogs at dad-camp.com, took within the photo from a father's perspective, saying the magazine used classic baiting strategy to draw readers in whereas Grumet's own parenting was too extreme for him.
"Breastfeeding is natural, perfect, and therefore the best thanks to nourish youngsters. This pose, and Ms Grumet's expertise and lifestyle, does not promote that," he blogged, noting that Grumet wasn't even a part of the most story however was featured during a sidebar.
Grumet additionally breastfeeds her adopted five-year-old son and acknowledged the controversy her parenting practices have created.
She told Time some individuals have said breastfeeding her sons at their age is like kid molestation. She said she cannot reason with such people.
"People need to notice this is often biologically traditional. it isn't socially traditional," she told the magazine in an interview. "The additional individuals see it, the additional it's going to become traditional in our culture. that is what i am hoping. i would like individuals to ascertain it."
Grumet additionally told Time she was breastfed herself till she was six years recent and he or she remembers it as an expertise that was like "embracing your mother, like a hug."
"You feel comforted, nurtured and very, very loved," she said. "I had most self-confidence as a baby, and that i apprehend it's from that."
Grumet added that her own mother "wasn't a hippie" however breastfed her for thus long as a result of her oldsters were very into nutrition.
The Time cowl has already depart a series of net memes -- one replaces Grumet's face with that of the late Princess Diana, a nod to a different controversial magazine cowl, in that instance for NewsWeek, where a picture of the deceased royal was manipulated to depict how she could have looked if she were still alive.
Another uses identical image however changes the cover's headline to "Are you wanting to sell magazines?"
Vanity honest Magazine took things more into the longer term, publishing a fictional blog concerning an interaction with a college-age Aram within the year 2027.
In an imagined classroom setting, Aram is asked for his thoughts concerning mass media and sensationalism, a matter he tries to avoid, despite a teaching assistant concerning the Time cowl.
"All I even have to mention is, it's enough," the fictional grown-up Aram says, prompting his questioner to retort, "You assume the subject's been milked for all its worth?"
Shocking or no big deal? A woman breastfeeding her 3-year-old son is the cover photo of this week's Time magazine for a story on "attachment parenting," and reactions ranged from applause to cringing to shrugs.
TORONTO — The jury's out on whether or not it's breastfeeding at its best or parenting at its worst. Either way, it's a picture that has tongues wagging.
A controversial Time magazine cowl photo goes viral and folks across the world, Canadians included, are voicing their opinions.
The image options Jamie Lynne Grumet, a slim, blonde 26-year-old la mother of 2, breastfeeding her younger son Aram, who turns four next month.
Aram stands on a chair to succeed in his mother's chest and casts a sidelong look at the camera as he feeds.
The accompanying headline for a story on attachment parenting asks readers in bright red letters if they're "mom enough."
Many took to the web to criticize the photograph, saying its widespread publication would hurt Aram when he grows older.
"Kid's too recent," Tammy King wrote on Canadian Family magazine's Facebook page. "That is simply too extreme," added Lisa Matthews.
Toronto-based blogger Dee Brun wasted no time ripping into Grumet for subjecting her son to unavoidable teasing within the future.
"The real story here lies with that three year recent boy who can need to re-live this image OVER and OVER for the remainder of his life," the mother of 4 blogged. "SHAME ON MOM... for making one thing her son can NEVER be able to escape from."
Others, however, expressed support for Grumet, saying she was brave to indicate there's nothing wrong with a natural method.
"Get over it individuals," Nicole Demers Sivyer wrote, adding that the typical age of weaning round the world ranges from 3 years to 6.
"I'm appalled and saddened by the blatant disregard for kid-lead weaning and therefore the standards that some individuals feel they have to impose on how others offer nourishment for his or her child."
Melissa Dickinson, meanwhile, chided some for viewing the image in an exploitative lightweight.
"If this seems like kid porn to you then you're a pervert and therefore the problems lie among you," she posted.
Still additional merely expressed their surprise at the provocative image and accused Time of using it simply to sell copies when the magazine hits stands.
"Her selections do not have an effect on any of ours," wrote Alexise Dodd Clarke. "It's obvious they're obtaining the eye from the quilt they wished."
Calgary resident Buzz Bishop, who blogs at dad-camp.com, took within the photo from a father's perspective, saying the magazine used classic baiting strategy to draw readers in whereas Grumet's own parenting was too extreme for him.
"Breastfeeding is natural, perfect, and therefore the best thanks to nourish youngsters. This pose, and Ms Grumet's expertise and lifestyle, does not promote that," he blogged, noting that Grumet wasn't even a part of the most story however was featured during a sidebar.
Grumet additionally breastfeeds her adopted five-year-old son and acknowledged the controversy her parenting practices have created.
She told Time some individuals have said breastfeeding her sons at their age is like kid molestation. She said she cannot reason with such people.
"People need to notice this is often biologically traditional. it isn't socially traditional," she told the magazine in an interview. "The additional individuals see it, the additional it's going to become traditional in our culture. that is what i am hoping. i would like individuals to ascertain it."
Grumet additionally told Time she was breastfed herself till she was six years recent and he or she remembers it as an expertise that was like "embracing your mother, like a hug."
"You feel comforted, nurtured and very, very loved," she said. "I had most self-confidence as a baby, and that i apprehend it's from that."
Grumet added that her own mother "wasn't a hippie" however breastfed her for thus long as a result of her oldsters were very into nutrition.
The Time cowl has already depart a series of net memes -- one replaces Grumet's face with that of the late Princess Diana, a nod to a different controversial magazine cowl, in that instance for NewsWeek, where a picture of the deceased royal was manipulated to depict how she could have looked if she were still alive.
Another uses identical image however changes the cover's headline to "Are you wanting to sell magazines?"
Vanity honest Magazine took things more into the longer term, publishing a fictional blog concerning an interaction with a college-age Aram within the year 2027.
In an imagined classroom setting, Aram is asked for his thoughts concerning mass media and sensationalism, a matter he tries to avoid, despite a teaching assistant concerning the Time cowl.
"All I even have to mention is, it's enough," the fictional grown-up Aram says, prompting his questioner to retort, "You assume the subject's been milked for all its worth?"